In Asian philosophy, the concept of yin yang is used to describe how “seemingly contrary forces are interconnected and interdependent in the natural world, and how they give rise to each other in turn” (Wiki, 2012).
The central idea is that Yin Yang are not opposing forces, but complementary opposites that interact within a greater whole to give it strength and balance.

Similar to this ancient Asian principle, we believe that development is very much about balancing two opposite and interdependent dualities – optimising strengths and reducing the effect of performance risks, including weaknesses.
Prior to the strengths-based approach to talent development, the emphasis in employee development in most organisations was principally on overcoming deficits or weaknesses in individuals, teams and the organisation. Compelling research over the past 2 decades has shown the limitation of focusing only on remedying weaknesses, which tends to undermine engagement, productively and confidence, amongst other things. Positive psychology and the strengths practitioners have recommended redressing this deficit orientation by focusing on employee strengths and helping them optimise these to maximise performance outcomes, including wellbeing. This focus on employees’ strengths is all well and good, but weaknesses and other performance risks cannot be ignored, as many positive psychology and happiness ‘gurus’ might have you believe.
Achieving success is ensuring a fine balance between optimising individual and team strengths and reducing risks to performance, which we define as limiting weaknesses (as opposed to allowable weaknesses), overdone strengths (strengths that are used in the wrong way and cause unintended negative performance outcomes) and other sources of interference. These sources of interference include internal psychological blockers (e.g., poor self confidence and other limiting beliefs) or external blockers such as a culture that chokes or straightjackets the effective use of certain strengths. Only by understanding and engaging these dynamic and complementary development forces will the organisation be able to unlock the full potential and energy of its workforce.
James Brook, Director, Strengths Partnership Ltd





Happiness is a highly subjective state that depends on many complex factors including our genetic make-up, our upbringing and our internal representations of our achievements and progress. Rather than being an end in itself, it is a by-product of success. So, if employers really want to help people to improve their sense of subjective well-being and happiness, there is no panacea or standard formula. They need to ensure they understand each employee’s aspirations, unique strengths and values and help people achieve their goals in a way that is meaningful to them and plays their strengths as much as possible. This will facilitate personal feelings of success and progress, and in all probability, higher levels of subjective wellbeing and happiness.






